Branded student portal. Assignments. Score tracking. Targeted drill generation. Multi-dimensional diagnostic analytics. One platform, not five tools duct-taped together.
A Weaken question at position 8 and a Weaken question at position 22 are not the same test item. We measured it.
Start free trialStudent roster, assignments, scoring, branding, scheduling, billing—and multi-dimensional diagnostic analytics. One platform instead of six tools duct-taped together. Nothing to figure out, nothing to build.
Track every student from prospect through active engagement. Enrollment status, login history, assignment completion—all in one place. No spreadsheet to maintain, no students to lose track of.
Timed sections, full-length tests, auto-generated drills from question filters, review sets. Each assignment links to specific LSAT PrepTest sections with instructions and deadlines. Students see exactly what to do and when.
Students enter their answers by section. The platform grades against verified answer keys and immediately classifies every response by question type, difficulty, position, and your custom tags. You see per-question breakdowns across your full taxonomy without touching a spreadsheet.
Custom logo, colors, favicon, and subdomain. Your students log into your portal and see your name—not ours. Every tutor runs their own branded practice.
Session booking and calendar management integrated with your student roster. Students book directly from your portal—no Calendly link, no back-and-forth emails.
Invoicing and payment collection built into the platform. Students pay through your portal—no Venmo requests, no separate billing tool, no reconciliation.
Walk into your first session with data-backed diagnostics. The platform compresses the experience curve—run a diagnostic LSAT PrepTest section and immediately show your student where they break down, by question type, by position, by cognitive tag. No months of manual observation required.
We’ll make you look smart in front of your students.
You already know which question types are hard and where students tend to struggle. The platform quantifies those intuitions—and surfaces the blind spots. See whether it’s Weaken questions in general or late-section Weaken under fatigue. Show your students the data behind your recommendations. Enable student self-practice and your students keep drilling between sessions—filtered by the same question types and tags you use in your diagnostics.
You already know this. We quantify it.
Not just “Logical Reasoning” or “Reading Comprehension.” Our taxonomy decomposes each question by cognitive operation, difficulty, position, and cross-cutting features—calibrated against 59 PrepTest editions.
Student analytics break down performance by reasoning mode and polarity, so you see exactly where propositional sufficiency or necessity reasoning breaks down.
“Does the argument hold up?”
Sufficiency pole
Necessity pole
“What’s the pattern?”
“How does the argument work?”
Not “Logical Reasoning is weak”—which cognitive operation fails, at which position, under which conditions. Orientation, polarity, sublabel × position × tag breakdowns surface the specific intersections where your student struggles.
| Q1-12 | Q13-18 | Q19+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weaken | 78% | 52% | 31% |
| NA | 85% | 60% | 38% |
| Identify Flaw | 90% | 71% | 55% |
Generate a set of 10 unattempted Weaken questions from positions 13–24, difficulty 2–3, with the conditional-logic tag. Every question is a specific coordinate—LSAT PrepTest edition, section, question number—not a vague recommendation.
Tag questions with your own pedagogical categories— “day-1-homework”, “conditional-mastery”, “review-before-test”. Your tags feed into drill recommendations alongside our empirical taxonomy. Your vocabulary, our data.
Platform taxonomy
Your tags
Per-question pacing breakdown. Know whether a student is spending 4 minutes on a 90-second question—and which question types cause it.
| Type | Avg | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Weaken | 3:42 | 1:30 |
| NA | 2:15 | 1:30 |
| MSS | 1:28 | 1:30 |
Leave comments on completed assignments. Students see your feedback alongside their scores—no separate email thread, no lost notes.
Watch the negation in Q17—the stimulus uses “not all” which is weaker than “none”.
Strong improvement on late-section Weaken. Keep drilling positions 19+.
Flag specific questions with notes: “watch the negation,” “classic trap answer.” Annotations persist and surface when the student encounters that question type again.
“Classic sufficient/necessary reversal. Diagram the conditional before reading answer choices.”
Practice doesn’t stop when the tutoring session ends.
Tutors can enable self-serve practice. Students generate their own drills filtered by question type, difficulty, reasoning mode, and custom tags. The composition readiness gauge shows how their practice distribution compares to the actual LSAT blueprint. Weakest areas surfaced automatically from analytics: no waiting for an assignment, no back-and-forth about what to work on next.
The platform schedules practice by question type and difficulty at increasing intervals: weak areas come back sooner, strong areas fade out. Previously missed questions can optionally resurface too. No flashcard app, no manual scheduling.
Set a target score. The platform shows which question types need the most improvement to close the gap, weighted by frequency on recent tests. Students see exactly how far they are and which categories close the gap fastest.
A conditional-logic flaw question isn’t testing flaw identification—it’s testing conditional reasoning under pressure. Tags like conditional-logic, viewpoint-tracking, and comparative measure compound skills, not single skills.
LR difficulty peaks in positions 19–24 (mean 3.11) then drops at Q25–26 (mean 2.95). The hardest stretch ends before the final question—a pacing insight that changes time management strategy.
Time-series regression across 59 PrepTest editions shows RC difficulty increasing at 6× the LR rate (R² = 0.51, p < 0.0001). Within LR, the core propositional sublabels are stable, but the mix is shifting from broad retrieval toward nuanced inference—Rhetorical Function and Comparative Stance Inference rising, Main Point and Attitude/Tone falling.
One plan. One price.
| Platform fee | $49/month |
| Per active student | $5/student/month |
| Included | 3 active students |
| Cap | $249/month |
| Trial | 14 days, no card |
“Active” = any recorded attempt or login in trailing 30 days. Students who stop logging in don’t count toward your bill.
What you actually pay, step by step
Day 1: You sign up with no students
You pay nothing. You get a branded portal, the full analytics engine, and the question taxonomy immediately. No credit card required. Full platform, unlimited students for 14 days.
Day 5: You add 2 students
Still $0. You’re in your trial—every feature is unlocked, no restrictions.
Day 14: Your trial ends
Subscribe for $49/month to keep your portal active. Your first 3 active students are included in the platform fee—no extra charge until you grow past that.
Month 2: You have 8 active students
$49 platform fee + $25 (5 above the included 3 × $5 each) = $74/month.
Later: You have 50 active students
The cap kicks in at $249/month. You never pay more than that, no matter how many students you add.
How we think about pricing
Your subscription is how we make money. That’s the entire list. We pass through Stripe processing fees at cost. We publish research from aggregate, de-identified data because it’s useful. Beyond that, there are no hidden revenue streams.
No ads. No data sales. No upselling features that cost us nothing to deliver. No shrinking your plan after you sign up. This is premium software priced to sustain the business—not to extract value from manufactured scarcity.
We may offer a group-practice tier for multi-tutor organizations in the future, but today the platform is one plan at one price.
The test prep industry has a paranoia problem. We think there’s a better way to run a business.
Some companies in this space will threaten to sue you for discussing their materials, lock down every interaction behind a non-disclosure agreement, and treat their customers like potential adversaries. That is not how we work. Your data is yours. Our terms are readable. If you cancel, we delete your data on request—no hostage negotiations.
Our edge is not that we hoard information. It’s that we built a genuinely good platform: a proprietary 39-type question taxonomy calibrated against 59 PrepTest editions, multi-dimensional analytics that no spreadsheet can replicate, and practice-management tooling that just works. If someone copied our feature list tomorrow, they’d still need to build it, maintain it, and keep the data pipeline current. That’s the moat—the craft, not the curtain.
We analyze aggregate, de-identified performance data across the platform and publish the findings. Question-type difficulty curves. Position effects. Cross-cutting cognitive patterns. This research makes the LSAT prep ecosystem better for everyone—tutors and students—and it lets you verify that our taxonomy claims are evidence-based, not marketing.
We make money from your subscription. That’s it. No ads, no data brokering, no “premium tier” that locks away features you need. There is one tier. Every tutor gets the same platform. The only variable is how many students you have. We don’t manufacture scarcity to extract upgrades.
We may build a group-practice tier for multi-tutor organizations down the road, but for now it’s one plan at one price.
Syllogic is a practice management and analytics platform for independent LSAT tutors. You manage your student roster, assign LSAT® PrepTest sections, track scores, and run your billing—all from a branded portal with your name on it. The platform also generates multi-dimensional diagnostic breakdowns by question type, position, difficulty, and your own custom tags. It is not a test prep course and does not compete with your tutoring.
Yes. Tutors need their own LawHub Advantage subscription ($120/year from LSAC) for access to actual test content. Syllogic provides analytics, diagnostics, and management tools—not copyrighted LSAT questions or passages. This is the industry standard; 7Sage and PowerScore work the same way.
Our proprietary taxonomy classifies every LSAT question into one of 39 sublabel types across three reasoning modes: propositional, inductive, and structural. Each sublabel has measured difficulty rankings, position effects, and cross-cutting cognitive tags. The taxonomy is calibrated against 59 PrepTest editions. This data is not published by LSAC. Read the methodology.
Create labels that match your teaching framework—“day-1-homework”, “conditional-mastery”, “review-before-test”—and apply them to any question. Your tags appear in analytics alongside our empirical taxonomy, so you can filter diagnostics by your own vocabulary. Your categories, our data.
Any student with a recorded attempt or login in the trailing 30 days. Your first 3 active students are included in the $49 platform fee. Beyond that, each additional active student is $5/month. Students who stop logging in don’t count toward your bill—you only pay for the students you’re actively working with.
Those are student-facing prep courses—they sell directly to students and provide their own curriculum. Syllogic is tutor-facing infrastructure. Your brand, your students, your pedagogy, your business. We provide the analytical engine and management platform underneath.
Yes. Custom logo, colors, favicon, and subdomain. Your students log into your portal and see your name. We stay invisible.
All modern PrepTest editions (PT101+). The taxonomy, difficulty rankings, and position data are calibrated against 59 PrepTest editions and growing with each new LSAC release.
Your data is yours. We never sell or broker tutor or student data. Individually identifiable records are never shared with third parties. We may publish aggregate, de-identified statistics (e.g., question-type difficulty trends across the platform) for research purposes. You can export your students’ scores and custom tags at any time. If you leave, we delete your data on request. There are no ads in the platform, no sponsored placements, and no secondary monetization of your usage.
No. There is nothing to integrate. We set up your branded portal with your subdomain, logo, and colors. Your students get a login link. No code, no embedding, no API keys, no website changes. If you already have a website, just add a link to your portal—a regular “Student Login” button pointing to your subdomain is all you need.
14 days, no credit card required. After that, $49/month to keep your portal active. Your first 3 active students are included in the platform fee. There is no feature gating—the trial and the paid plan are the same platform. If you don’t subscribe after the trial, your portal goes read-only: students can still see their history, but no new attempts or assignments can be created.
You sign up with 5 students. During the 14-day trial you pay nothing. After the trial you subscribe: $49 platform fee + $10 (2 students above the included 3, at $5 each) = $59/month. If a student stops logging in, they drop off your count after 30 days. The cap is $249/month regardless of roster size.
Yes, if you enable it. Tutors control a per-portal toggle that lets students generate their own drills filtered by question type, difficulty, and custom tags. Analytics link directly to practice, so students can drill their weakest areas without waiting for an assignment. You keep full visibility into what they practice.
The core platform is already live: branded portals, assignments, analytics, self-practice, scheduling, and billing. What’s next is the deeper analytics layer: spaced repetition by question type and difficulty, richer timing analytics, target score gap analysis, and more granular annotation workflows.